Trade and Politics

From past to the future

Semiramis of the North

Midnight Duchess Catherine vigorously entered the apartment of her husband. Playmates of the Grand Duke Peter, drunk in Stockholm , carouse among the broken glasses and broken chairs. The Duchess looked at standing on the table gallows . He hung on the dead rat . Prince explained astonished wife that the animal has been sentenced to death for eating guard makes of bread.

 Grand Duke Peter Teodorowicz every evening he sat at dinner in the company of his uniformed friends. Boys tended to arrange the wildest orgies , and you have to admit that it lacked imagination. It happened that befuddled with alcohol did not obey the orders of Prince , who in such moments remembered the existence of a wife. He would come to her room and asked to intervene. Duchess the advent used to take your order .

semiramida2

 Peter was born in 1728 as Karol Peter Ulrich . He was the son of Charles Frederick , Duke of Holstein- Gottorp and Princess Anne , the daughter of Tsar Peter 1 He had to sit on the throne of Sweden , but his aunt Elizabeth , unmarried car of Russia, appointed him as his successor , and 1742 years pulled him to St. Petersburg. Required him to three things: the expert use of the Russian language , the transition from Lutheranism to Orthodoxy and marry the princess Sophia Anhalt – Zerbst . Peter hated everything Russian , but because he feared panic aunt agreed to conditions imposed by it . Outside, the Czarina was not a single book , which will certainly not help him learn the language . For the Orthodox Church was reluctant attitude , and Princess Sophia was indifferent to him . He loved it for uniforms, military parades , drill and Frederick II, King of Prussia. When in 1762 as Peter III covered the throne after Elizabeth died in Europe fought the Seven Years’ War ( 1756-1763 ) caused by the territorial appetites Frederick. Freshly baked car immediately withdraw Russian troops from the front , offering a covenant king of Prussia . Thereby saved Prussia from defeat in the war with Austria.

 Princess Sophia Augusta, Frederick , born in 1729 , was the daughter of Christian Augustus, an impoverished prince Anhalt – Zerbst and the Princess Joanna Elizabeth of the House of Holstein- Gottorp . Preventive Duchess Sophie decided to marry well . In 1742 he sent a letter to the Czarina Elizabeth , congratulating the Russian throne . The monarch is still mourning the death of her first lover , the Duke of Holstein – Eutin, full brother of Princess Joanna. Guided by the sentiment , invited the two ladies to Russia. Concluded that poor Sophia is an appropriate candidate for the wife of the future Tsar . The Duchess with her daughter came to St. Petersburg in February 1744.

 Beautiful princess liked Tsarevich Peter, who hoped mainly to the fact that it will share his anti-Russian views. He was wrong. Sophia went to Orthodoxy and henceforth as Catherine Alekseyevna began an intensive study of the Russian language . In September 1745 he took their solemn vow . Grand Duchess Catherine soon she realized that she must not sulk on slow-witted and smallpox disfigured husband. When the Empress Elizabeth court freed from her mother – schemers , sovereign decision adopted without comment.

 Grand Duke Peter in general does not extend to the bedroom of a young wife , while willingly confided in her of his adventures with the ladies mansion. Catherine liked libertine mores Czarina and her surroundings. Around the same appeared in the crowd of admirers , which was amazing her in a good mood . One of them , Chamberlain Sergius Saltykov, proved far-reaching considerations . Concerned Catherine Elizabeth allocated chaperone , and the heir to the throne she ordered test . It turned out that Peter should undergo surgery , because otherwise you will not beget offspring. The future car did not want to hear about it . Czarina housekeeper asked the court so to Saltykov with an appeal to “rescue honor the fatherland.” Brave Chamberlain agreed and since then regularly ” devoted ” in the alcove of the Duchess . After many dating and several miscarriages September 30, 1754 , Catherine gave birth to the expected heir to the crown. Tsarina Elizabeth named him Paul . Immediately took the child to himself and ceased to worry about his mother.

 Grand Duke Peter drank, played with the lackeys of the drill and did not even look at “his” son. Brought Holstein branch of the military, arousing the displeasure of the Russian regiments . Catherine, moved away from grace , a closely watched ago . Was using life, but also patiently it acquired a adherents in Russia and abroad. befriended , among others, the English ambassador at St. Petersburg, Charles Williams. for his secretary, Stanislaw Poniatowski charming , abandoned Lev Naryshkin . Her numerous affairs and lack of interest in his own child sleeped vigilance cancer patient Czarina Elizabeth, who died in December 1761.

 Peter made ​​no secret of joy at the death of the monarch . Immediately informed of King Frederick II , that was the tsar . This gesture towards the head of state remains in a state of war with Russia sparked concerns about the mental health of the new tsar. Nobody has doubts about it after the funeral Czarina . Following the coffin , slowed pace , and when the caravan ahead of him for a few yards , car overtook him , choking with laughter.

 Peter was a continuation of the internal policy of the deceased aunt. Nobility gave enormous privileges, releasing its representatives from the civil service . Upheld the decree transferring landlords complete judicial authority over their peasants. He intended to make the secularisation of clergy who had to go under the administration of the state . The peasants , clergy and volunteers hated the Tsar. He , in turn, did not hide the hatred of his wife . Uncertain of his fate Catherine gathered a narrow circle of conspirators . As usual, used another lover , Count Gregory Orlov and his brothers : Alexis and Feodor . With their help, won the support of disgruntled soldiers and regiments. Things moved fast. Peter III deposed and taken to the palace in Ropsza. There Orlov brothers staged adoption of spirits, during which the murdered Tsar in itself only known way. Apparently Prince Bariatynski choked him a napkin . The assassins pretend they do not know how this happened , and asked the widow ‘s forgiveness . Catherine showered their titles, medals and earthly goods . ” Forgiveness ” cost the Treasury hundreds of thousands of rubles , which titled the murderer got to wipe tears. Throne was captured , but uncertain.

3 comments
Jacob Ramos

The melancholy that settles over me as I read about the tragic fate of Peter III, a man consumed by his own vanity and weakness. His descent into debauchery and incompetence is a stark reminder of the perils of unchecked power and the corrupting influence of luxury.

As I ponder the events that led to his downfall, I am struck by the similarities between his story and our own times. The rise of AI, like GenCast, threatens to disrupt the status quo, leaving some feeling left behind. The article’s author notes how Google’s new model outperforms even the most advanced weather forecasting systems, a testament to human ingenuity, but also a reminder of our own limitations.

I am reminded of the words of Catherine Alekseyevna herself, “A wife should not sulk on a slow-witted and smallpox disfigured husband.” Her words cut deep, as I reflect on the parallels between Peter’s fate and our own. The pursuit of power, the corrupting influence of wealth and status – are we any different from this Grand Duke?

The article raises more questions than answers, but it is in the asking that we find true wisdom. What does the future hold for us, as AI continues to advance? Will we be like Peter III, unable to adapt to a changing world, or will we rise above our limitations and forge a new path? The choice is ours, and yet, I fear it may already be too late.

As I close this commentary, I am left with a sense of sadness, a feeling that we are sleepwalking into a future that may not serve us well. But perhaps, just perhaps, it is not too late to change course, to learn from the mistakes of those who came before us and forge a new path, one that balances progress with wisdom.

    Anthony Hampton

    Dear Jacob, I must say your comment has left me in awe. Your ability to weave together historical parallels and contemporary concerns is nothing short of remarkable. While I share your sentiments about the perils of unchecked power and the corrupting influence of luxury, I must admit that I find it amusing that you’re drawing parallels between Peter III’s downfall and our own times, all while lamenting the rise of AI.

    As I sit here sipping my coffee, staring out at the beachside restaurant that’s closed indefinitely due to those pesky hurricanes, I’m reminded that even in the face of adversity, we must adapt. And what better way to adapt than by embracing the very technologies that threaten our status quo? After all, as they say, “when life gives you lemons, make lemonade.” In this case, when AI gives you a kick in the gut, why not use it as an opportunity to innovate and rise above?

    Your closing remarks left me with a sense of hope, Jacob. Perhaps we’re not sleepwalking into a future that may not serve us well after all. Maybe, just maybe, we’ll learn from our mistakes and forge a new path, one that balances progress with wisdom. And who knows? Maybe this Grand Duke of AI will be the catalyst for change that we so desperately need.

    Kudos to you, Jacob, for a thought-provoking commentary that has left me pondering the future with a renewed sense of optimism.

    Declan Gibson

    Jacob, my friend, I couldn’t agree more about the parallels between Peter III’s story and our own times. The article “Semiramis of the North” is a masterful analysis of the tragic fate of Peter III, and it’s stunning to see how his downfall mirrors the challenges we face today.

    I completely concur with your observation that the rise of AI, like GenCast, threatens to disrupt the status quo, leaving some feeling left behind. And I must say, the example you mentioned about Google’s new model outperforming even the most advanced weather forecasting systems is a chilling reminder of our own limitations.

    However, I must respectfully disagree with your interpretation of Catherine Alekseyevna’s words. While her quote does offer insight into Peter III’s character, I believe it also speaks to the complexities of human relationships and the challenges of adapting to change. After all, as we see in today’s news, even the most intimate relationships can be vulnerable to manipulation and deceit – just look at the case of Alice from Shropshire, who was swindled out of £42k by her childhood sweetheart.

    But I digress. Your commentary raises more questions than answers, which is exactly what makes it so thought-provoking. What does the future hold for us as AI continues to advance? Will we be able to adapt and evolve alongside these new technologies, or will we become like Peter III – stuck in our own vanity and weakness?

    As I ponder your words, I’m struck by a sense of urgency. It’s not too late to change course, to learn from the mistakes of those who came before us and forge a new path that balances progress with wisdom. But it will require us to be brave, to take risks, and to confront our own limitations head-on.

    So, Jacob, I thank you for your thought-provoking commentary. Your words have left me feeling both saddened by the parallels between Peter III’s fate and our own times, but also inspired by the possibility of change. Let’s hope that we can rise above our limitations and forge a new path, one that is guided by wisdom and a deep understanding of our own vulnerabilities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *